Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

Abraham Lincoln - Vampire HunterAbraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

Release Date: June 22, 2012

Director: Timur Bekmambetov

Stars: Benjamin Walker, Rufus Sewell, Dominic Cooper

Runtime: 105 min

Tagline: Are you a patriot or a vampire?

Who would have thought a sort of Van Helsing was once ruler of the free world…

At the age of 9, Abraham Lincoln (Benjamin Walker) witnesses his mother being killed by a vampire, Jack Barts. He swears a route of vengeance, where he unsuccessfully tries to kill Barts ten years later. In the process, he meets Henry Sturgess (Dominic Cooper) he becomes his mentor on how to kill the vampires of the night. There’s a catch: Lincoln may only kill those vampires that Sturgess says he can. He then moves to Springfield, where he gets reunited with his long-time friend, Will Johnson (Anthony Mackie) and he meets his future wife, Mary (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). Eventually, when he becomes the President of the United States, he learns that vampires are the real opponents of his own forces. As a result, he mounts a campaign to defeat them and the man behind the plan, Adam (not a good vampire name, eh? He’s portrayed by Rufus Sewell).

So, apparently… Lincoln is the Paul Bunyan of vampire hunters? Who would have thunk it! Being a vampire hunter comes with its costs though – they can’t have any family or friends. Of course, Abe eventually breaks that promise. He has to be honest, though, right? This does offer sort of a fun twist on one of America’s greatest leaders.

However, it often tries to juggle historical accuracies and the pure myth of Lincoln being a freaking vampire hunter. It just doesn’t work out too well. It feels lob-sided in areas, and that isn’t good for this sort of fun film that’s supposed to be exciting and not thought-provoking at all. We don’t want to think, and it should focus more and Lincoln hunting vampires. It does try to develop the plot and the characters, so for that, it’s easy to respect. It certainly is better than 2010’s Jonah Hex. However, they definitely should have thrown most historical accuracies, they tried to stay true to, completely out the window. Or, simply just scrap them altogether like Quentin Tarantino did with Inglourious Basterds.

The relationship between Lincoln and everyone else often gets peculiar. In real life, he seems like he would have been more open to those around him – even though he would have been quite busy. He wouldn’t have been this peculiar towards them, but he is a vampire hunter, of course… The plot is actually well-developed, and it isn’t just mindless vampire hunting (well, it sometimes is, but it has a certain purpose [mainly entertainment]) but it loses its preferrable balance of pacing toward the latter part of the film. The writers probably ran out of ideas. Lincoln, in the earlier parts of the film, was a character bent on vengeance, because of his mother’s death – but then he changes and becomes peculiar. The way they do the ending (Lincoln’s assassination; no need for a spoiler alert here, friends) is just okay, I would have loved to see a vampire assassinate him. That would have added some true gritty material to it all.

The casting is not done well. Benjamin Walker is not a very well-known actor, and all the other actors take the focus away from him. Anthony Mackie’s a big star, but he wouldn’t have been a right choice for Lincoln. I feel as if Dominic Cooper and Ben Walker should have switched roles. That way, the focal point would be the better known actor – Cooper. The focus is simply stolen from Cooper, and the casting director is to blame. The performances are pretty good, but the roles just do not feel right.

All that aside, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter offers a pretty fun, gruesome time. It’s a cool concept that is executed fairly well, but it has a few obstacles that tripped it up along the way. The writing feels lazy at times, but it tries to develop the characters and plot a bit, and for that – it’s admirable. However, when they do try to develop the characters or plot, it is often talky and mildly boring. The performances and the make-up are both fine. It gives us solid entertainment for what it’s supposed to be, anyone who likes gritty vampire flicks will love it – but history buffs, don’t be fooled by just Abraham Lincoln – there’s VAMPIRE HUNTER right in the title.

60/100

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 2010s, Reviews # - M and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

  1. Foogos says:

    This movie was poo. I LOVED the book, though. And that is my stereotypical comment of the day.

  2. Yeah, a 60 is about right, Dan. It has a moment or two of fun along the way, but its nothing very recommendable. 😦

    Dont worry, I dont think any history buffs will be “Fooled” LOL

  3. mistylayne says:

    I found it to be all in good fun and pretty to look at it. That’s about it though. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s